Opportunity Diagnostic - sample report
A source-linked view of where to focus, monitor, partner, or ignore.
This public-safe sample shows the structure of a Tender Radar diagnostic. Labels are fictionalized and realistic; there are no real client names, government logos, award promises, or attorney-style opinions.
Decision support only. Source details remain reviewable by the client. No award, eligibility, compliance, or acceptance promise is expressed or implied.
24
public notices screened
6
opportunities surfaced
3
recommended for action
1. Capability profile
Core services
- Cybersecurity assessment support
- Cloud engineering and migration
- Managed IT and help desk modernization
- Data reporting support
Delivery posture
- Small technical consultancy
- Remote-first delivery capacity
- Selective subcontracting acceptable
- 2-6 week response capacity
Reject filters
- Prime-only scope without partner path
- Onsite-only work outside service area
- Proposal deadline under 5 days
- Mandatory past performance gap
2. Source map
Each future monitoring setup should start from sources that can be reviewed, not from black-box recommendations.
Federal notices
Solicitations and pre-solicitation notices. Source link included in client report.
State portals
Open bids and forecast pages. Source link included in client report.
Local bid boards
Regional procurement pages. Source link included in client report.
Public teaming sources
Public subcontracting and teaming pages. Source link included in client report.
3. Opportunity table
| Opportunity | Source status | Fit score | Deadline | Reject reason | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cybersecurity assessment support Regional technology office | Public source link included | 86 / 100 | 12 days | No material blocker found in first-pass review. | Pursue |
| Cloud migration support Public services digital unit | Public source link included | 72 / 100 | 19 days | Prime experience gap may require a partner. | Partner |
| Help desk modernization Civic operations bureau | Public source link included | 61 / 100 | 31 days | Incumbent appears likely; monitor for recompete pattern. | Monitor |
| Data reporting support Community systems office | Public source link included | 38 / 100 | 5 days | Scope and timing mismatch. | Ignore |
| Network documentation support Facilities technology team | Public source link included | 58 / 100 | 22 days | Onsite requirement needs confirmation. | Monitor |
| Endpoint monitoring support Shared services program | Public source link included | 69 / 100 | 16 days | Tooling fit is strong, but staffing requirement may exceed current capacity. | Partner |
4. Fit score and pursuit decision
86
Top candidate fit score
Recommended action: pursue
- Confirm two named technical leads before internal go / no-go.
- Validate the response deadline at the original source.
- Request clarification on remote participation if ambiguous.
- Prepare a concise pursuit brief before drafting.
5. Next-step summary
The diagnostic suggests one immediate pursuit candidate, two partner or monitor candidates, and three items that should not consume proposal time without new evidence. If this signal is useful, the next practical step is a narrow weekly monitoring scope tied to the same source map and reject filters.